Fear And Loathing In The App Store 2 - Apple Rejects App For Being Too Simple
Fear And Loathing In The App Store 2 - Apple Rejects App For Being Too Simple
Written by Lucy Black   
Thursday, 13 February 2014

Perhaps it is just the time of year, or perhaps it is a news trend but Apple have proved once again that the App Store isn't quite paradise. The latest reason for rejection is being too simple.

Your first reaction must be to think "yes, a good thing". Far too many weekend programmers get an app accepted after spending virtually no time at all on learning their craft or designing their program. Take Flappy Bird for example - the world would be a much better place without such simple code clogging up the works. 

I can see the point.

However, it is all a matter of who decides what is simple and what is not.

As argued in  Fear And Loathing In The App Store - Apple Drops Bitcoin App we have accepted the authoritarian app store in return for untold wealth and riches beyond compare.  Many indie programmers are happy with the idea, but still have nightmares that their prize creation will be rejected or perhaps worse thrown out of the marketplace for no reason at all. 

The last piece of news to make you think about the situation comes from the oddly named Hueman Collective:

"The Hueman Collective got together over a long weekend, made up of developers, designers, musicians and filmmakers. Our goal was simply to get together to make something that weekend; anything."

The app they created was a happiness tracker. You simply entered your personal happiness today compared to yesterday. The app only needed a few seconds per day and eventually allowed users to see how their happiness was fluctuating over time. Not a complex idea and the app was implemented as two simple web views - the submission screen and the graph. It needed to be a mobile app rather than a web app because it stored data on the phone and there were plans to add more features that made use of iOS. 

huemanapp

Apple's rejection provided a very clear reason for why the app wasn't worthy:

"We found that your app only provides a very limited set of features. It only functions as a once a day mood tracker. While we value simplicity, we consider simplicity to be uncomplicated - not limited in features and functionality."

The rest of the rejection seems to be a recommendation for feature bloat as a solution to the problem.  

You also need to remember that the App Store has its fill of apps that you might want to call "simple" such as flashlight apps and various joke apps. Could it be that the fact that this was submitted as a free app biased the decision? 

This isn't the first app to be rejected because it was classified as "too simple" but in this case there seems to be a valid use case. 

You can side with Apple and say that this app is too simple to be worthwhile, but it is not simplicity that governs the value of an app - it is how much users actually want something like it and the only proof of this lies in the market. 

When we set others up as judge and jury of our creations we had  better be sure of their credentials and motivations.

 

huemanicon

More Information

Apple, Have a Little Huemanity

Related Articles

Fear and Loathing In The App Store

  1. Apple Drops Bitcoin App 
  2. Apple Rejects App For Being Too Simple     
  3. Banned For Life      
  4. When Apps Vanish
  5. Apple Doesn't Want Amateur Hour       
  6. Apple's Reasons For Rejection 
  7. Google Wants Everyone To Know Where You Live   
  8. Apple Takes Down Innovative App      
  9. The EFF Refuses Apple's Conditions       
  10. Firefox Gets A Walled Garden        
  11. Apple Is Watching       
  12. Apple Punishes IFixit  
  13. Fear And Loathing In the App Store 13 - Apple Rejects Gravity 
  14. Apple Rejects F.lux And It Isn't Even In The App Store!
  15. Apple Bans F.lux And Then Duplicates  It
  16. App Store Income Dashed With No Appeal
  17. The Strange Case Of AdNauseam
  18. Apple Bans Templated Apps
  19. Apple Rejects Net Neutrality App
  20. Apple Stops Crypto Currency Mining App
  21. Oracle Owns JavaScript and Apple Pulls App

Jailbreaking the Developer  

Epic Games CEO Finally Notices That UWP Apps Are A Walled Garden

 

 

To be informed about new articles on I Programmer, install the I Programmer Toolbar, subscribe to the RSS feed, follow us on, Twitter, FacebookGoogle+ or Linkedin,  or sign up for our weekly newsletter.

 

justjsquare

 



 

Comments




or email your comment to: comments@i-programmer.info

 

Banner


Ruby 2.6 Adds JIT
11/06/2018

There's a new preview of Ruby that is the first in the Ruby 2.6.0 series. The developers say the preview has been released earlier than usual because it includes an important new feature, JIT.



Udacity Launches Data Scientist Nanodegree
24/05/2018

Udacity has launched a new Data Scientist Nanodegree program. At an advanced level it has projects designed by Bertelsmann, Figure Eight, IBM Watson, Insight, Kaggle and Starbucks which map to the ski [ ... ]


More News

 

Last Updated ( Wednesday, 20 January 2016 )
 
 

   
Banner
RSS feed of news items only
I Programmer News
Copyright © 2018 i-programmer.info. All Rights Reserved.
Joomla! is Free Software released under the GNU/GPL License.